|
|
wakefieldsaturdayleague.myfastforum.org
A message board for Wakefield District Saturday Football League.
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Lloydi |
England Call Up |
|
Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 929
Location: OUTWOOD mate |
| Thu May 08, 2008 3:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
troubled |
Championship |
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 279
|
| Thu May 08, 2008 5:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
troubled |
Championship |
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 279
|
| Thu May 08, 2008 5:28 pm |
|
|
|
|
troubled |
Championship |
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 279
|
| Thu May 08, 2008 5:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
troubled |
Championship |
|
|
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 279
|
| Thu May 08, 2008 5:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
Voakesy |
England Call Up |
|
|
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 893
Location: Two Brewers Boot Room |
| Fri May 09, 2008 7:05 am |
|
 Post subject:
What you all have to remember is that if Adam Hayton is cleared on Saturday and did play @ Outwood Park V Prostar on Saturday you may not be entirely cleared on this situation. If the Outwood web site is up to date he has played just 7 fixtures for Outwood, if any of them 7 fixtures are within 28 days of any game he has played for Padiham then he will be classed as illegible. If, you re unsure of this I would bring it to Hargreaves attention to minimise the damage. If Adam has told you he is playing for this Stanley team in West Yorks but is actually travelling to Burnley instead, maybe because he knows the rules and didnt want to miss out on a final, again you want to tell Hargreaves about it.
Were not out to get you at all, its rules, and we could have signed different players if this rule did not exist. And also, Bennett didn't like it at the time but I saved you a points deduction by tipping you off about this rule when you was thinking about playing for Albion reserves. I could have kept queit then and waited for you to play then shop you to Hargreaves. I dont think dicky would have played him in eligible, but if there as been a honest mistake then you wanna tell Hargreaves to minimise the damage.
I will repeat what Danny said, Div2 will be a battle next year if your in, something that we would prefer, would prefer to play a fiercely contested match that could go either way rather that beat shit teams like Inns 325-0!!! And to add to that your all a decent set of lads.
Either your in trouble, maybe even through a honest mistake, Adam is in trouble or Padiham. _________________ Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions!
|
|
|
Leeds |
Championship |
|
Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 265
Location: In the pub |
| Fri May 09, 2008 8:06 am |
|
|
|
|
bennett44 |
England Call Up |
|
|
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 670
|
| Fri May 09, 2008 8:34 am |
|
 Post subject:
| Voakesy wrote: | What you all have to remember is that if Adam Hayton is cleared on Saturday and did play @ Outwood Park V Prostar on Saturday you may not be entirely cleared on this situation. If the Outwood web site is up to date he has played just 7 fixtures for Outwood, if any of them 7 fixtures are within 28 days of any game he has played for Padiham then he will be classed as illegible. If, you re unsure of this I would bring it to Hargreaves attention to minimise the damage. If Adam has told you he is playing for this Stanley team in West Yorks but is actually travelling to Burnley instead, maybe because he knows the rules and didnt want to miss out on a final, again you want to tell Hargreaves about it.
Were not out to get you at all, its rules, and we could have signed different players if this rule did not exist. And also, Bennett didn't like it at the time but I saved you a points deduction by tipping you off about this rule when you was thinking about playing for Albion reserves. I could have kept queit then and waited for you to play then shop you to Hargreaves. I dont think dicky would have played him in eligible, but if there as been a honest mistake then you wanna tell Hargreaves to minimise the damage.
I will repeat what Danny said, Div2 will be a battle next year if your in, something that we would prefer, would prefer to play a fiercely contested match that could go either way rather that beat shit teams like Inns 325-0!!! And to add to that your all a decent set of lads.
Either your in trouble, maybe even through a honest mistake, Adam is in trouble or Padiham. | in england you av to prove with out any doubt 100% that outwood vic are guilty of wot you are saying and in this case you carnt simple as. padiham av already lied about saturday so wot else cud they lie about. see you in div2 next season cos i no 100% we will be in that div howeva much you try to get us kicked out. as for the pm about that pre season thing you can fuck off with it i for sure will not be there and am sure the rest of outwood vic wont either _________________ http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/outwoodvictoriafc/
|
|
|
Voakesy |
England Call Up |
|
|
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 893
Location: Two Brewers Boot Room |
| Fri May 09, 2008 8:44 am |
|
 Post subject:
| bennett44 wrote: | | Voakesy wrote: | What you all have to remember is that if Adam Hayton is cleared on Saturday and did play @ Outwood Park V Prostar on Saturday you may not be entirely cleared on this situation. If the Outwood web site is up to date he has played just 7 fixtures for Outwood, if any of them 7 fixtures are within 28 days of any game he has played for Padiham then he will be classed as illegible. If, you re unsure of this I would bring it to Hargreaves attention to minimise the damage. If Adam has told you he is playing for this Stanley team in West Yorks but is actually travelling to Burnley instead, maybe because he knows the rules and didnt want to miss out on a final, again you want to tell Hargreaves about it.
Were not out to get you at all, its rules, and we could have signed different players if this rule did not exist. And also, Bennett didn't like it at the time but I saved you a points deduction by tipping you off about this rule when you was thinking about playing for Albion reserves. I could have kept queit then and waited for you to play then shop you to Hargreaves. I dont think dicky would have played him in eligible, but if there as been a honest mistake then you wanna tell Hargreaves to minimise the damage.
I will repeat what Danny said, Div2 will be a battle next year if your in, something that we would prefer, would prefer to play a fiercely contested match that could go either way rather that beat shit teams like Inns 325-0!!! And to add to that your all a decent set of lads.
Either your in trouble, maybe even through a honest mistake, Adam is in trouble or Padiham. | in england you av to prove with out any doubt 100% that outwood vic are guilty of wot you are saying and in this case you carnt simple as. padiham av already lied about saturday so wot else cud they lie about. see you in div2 next season cos i no 100% we will be in that div howeva much you try to get us kicked out. as for the pm about that pre season thing you can fuck off with it i for sure will not be there and am sure the rest of outwood vic wont either  |
if you want to take your bat and ball home over this Ric then fine. All my posts on this subject have only been stating what it says on the internet, either on Adams Bebo Site, Padiham FC or Burnley Express, all sites available to anyone and everyone. All the evidence that is available on the web stacks up to him playing for Padiham. If not, as my previous posts have said Padiham will be in trouble for playing someone else under Adams name. _________________ Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions!
|
|
|
bennett44 |
England Call Up |
|
|
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 670
|
| Fri May 09, 2008 9:34 am |
|
 Post subject:
| Voakesy wrote: | | bennett44 wrote: | | Voakesy wrote: | What you all have to remember is that if Adam Hayton is cleared on Saturday and did play @ Outwood Park V Prostar on Saturday you may not be entirely cleared on this situation. If the Outwood web site is up to date he has played just 7 fixtures for Outwood, if any of them 7 fixtures are within 28 days of any game he has played for Padiham then he will be classed as illegible. If, you re unsure of this I would bring it to Hargreaves attention to minimise the damage. If Adam has told you he is playing for this Stanley team in West Yorks but is actually travelling to Burnley instead, maybe because he knows the rules and didnt want to miss out on a final, again you want to tell Hargreaves about it.
Were not out to get you at all, its rules, and we could have signed different players if this rule did not exist. And also, Bennett didn't like it at the time but I saved you a points deduction by tipping you off about this rule when you was thinking about playing for Albion reserves. I could have kept queit then and waited for you to play then shop you to Hargreaves. I dont think dicky would have played him in eligible, but if there as been a honest mistake then you wanna tell Hargreaves to minimise the damage.
I will repeat what Danny said, Div2 will be a battle next year if your in, something that we would prefer, would prefer to play a fiercely contested match that could go either way rather that beat shit teams like Inns 325-0!!! And to add to that your all a decent set of lads.
Either your in trouble, maybe even through a honest mistake, Adam is in trouble or Padiham. | in england you av to prove with out any doubt 100% that outwood vic are guilty of wot you are saying and in this case you carnt simple as. padiham av already lied about saturday so wot else cud they lie about. see you in div2 next season cos i no 100% we will be in that div howeva much you try to get us kicked out. as for the pm about that pre season thing you can fuck off with it i for sure will not be there and am sure the rest of outwood vic wont either  |
if you want to take your bat and ball home over this Ric then fine. All my posts on this subject have only been stating what it says on the internet, either on Adams Bebo Site, Padiham FC or Burnley Express, all sites available to anyone and everyone. All the evidence that is available on the web stacks up to him playing for Padiham. If not, as my previous posts have said Padiham will be in trouble for playing someone else under Adams name. | bat and ball no voaksey there is away of doing things pal and the fact you did it on here first is bang out of order. if we was found guilty of something my all means put wot the hell you like on here but to drag outwood vic's name thru the mud and taint a great first season with aload of if's but's and maybe's you should be ashamed of yourself. there is a time and a place to bring things to the public's attention and the time is after the investigation not before. im sure if you think about it you will agree. _________________ http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/outwoodvictoriafc/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|