bennett44 wrote:

Voakesy wrote: Agreed, we got a list too, that had a lad called Matty Askins on, who only played a pre season game for us, we contacted the league and they confirmed he was ineligble, because he hasn't played 4 league matches. All me, Simon have said is what it says on Haytons Bebo site, Burnley Express site, which if he has played for Padiham within 28 days of any of your fixtures then that is against the rules, and the express says he played and scored for them on Sat. Wait and see what Hargreaves as to say once he has followed up with Padinham Secretary, and when he confirms what the sec told simon earlier today. how will you ever no wot is true and wot isnt?

Suppose we will have to wait and see what Hargreaves investigation bring wont we and take that as the 'truth'.

A lot of evidence pointing towards him playing for them thats all.

Burnley Express
Ahston Website
Adam Haytons Bebo Site
Padihams Secretary confirming to Simon on telephone that it is the same A Hayton.
Why has is 7 appearances for Outwood this season been so strung out? Is it because he has been playing elsewhere, Padiham or another team.  All things which Mr Hargreaves will look into I am sure.

_________________
Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions!

if the express says he played for them and scored saturday when clearly over 20plus people not contected to outwood saw him play for us against prostar saturday how can anything said from them be taken as the truth. sori in my eyes you aint got a leg to stand on
_________________
http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/outwoodvictoriafc/

bennett44 wrote:

if the express says he played for them and scored saturday when clearly over 20plus people not contected to outwood saw him play for us against prostar saturday how can anything said from them be taken as the truth. sori in my eyes you aint got a leg to stand on

Like I say, just wonder why it says in express that then?

Maybe Hargreaves will ask these 20 plus people and the whoever reffed it whether he played for you on sat.

Why would the Padiham Sec confirm it was the same A Hayton? Just a thought.
_________________
Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions!

im sure he played for chelsea against newcastle on sunday!! who gives a fuck! my grandad cud av played for outwood last nite and they still wud av won!! two brewers are a poor team

Voakesy wrote:

bennett44 wrote: if the express says he played for them and scored saturday when clearly over 20plus people not contected to outwood saw him play for us against prostar saturday how can anything said from them be taken as the truth. sori in my eyes you aint got a leg to stand on Like I say, just wonder why it says in express that then? Maybe Hargreaves will ask these 20 plus people and the whoever reffed it whether he played for you on sat. Why would the Padiham Sec confirm it was the same A Hayton? Just a thought.

      its great wen you no the truth i hope hargreaves does
_________________
http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/outwoodvictoriafc/

mcfadden wrote:

im sure he played for chelsea against newcastle on sunday!! who gives a fuck! my grandad cud av played for outwood last nite and they still wud av won!! two brewers are a poor team

its called rules, we could have signed various Ossett Town academy players if this rule wouldnt't have been there.
_________________
Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions! Thats why where champions!

Voakesy wrote:

mcfadden wrote: im sure he played for chelsea against newcastle on sunday!! who gives a fuck! my grandad cud av played for outwood last nite and they still wud av won!! two brewers are a poor team its called rules, we could have signed various Ossett Town academy players if this rule wouldnt't have been there.

rules rules rules
_________________
http://www.clubwebsite.co.uk/outwoodvictoriafc/

games over, looking at starting pre-season now!!!!

 whether some one played that shouldnt have or not is hardly the point, outwood outfought us and played the better football.

 although not happy someone saying our defence got destroyed!!!!

 didnt really see it that way! hayton may have been good but i thought you seem to have overlooked adam james and aaron(or however you spell it!) did an awful lot of ball winning and play making, and having a greater affect on outwood and us!!!

 dont think throwing coo up front and then calling the team brain dead for launching balls up front is the best policy!!!!! before that we should have been looking out wide as we did in the first half, but as we tired and outwood started to dominate which made it hard for the midfield to pick thier passes!

 we needed to raise our game and looking at it we didnt want it as much. we also felt sorry for ourselves and didnt have it in us to dig deep and show some testicular fortitude, we reached in and found we were lacking a pair!!!!!!        

go sign them next year outwood wud still do you

thought you could lose gracefully.
As nike said.............Just do it?